Teeny-Tiny, more like a 3.5 tree. Too much money for a whole lotta trunk.
I was really disappointed with my 5 foot tree, mainly the size. Yes, it is TECHNICALLY 5 ft (53) to be exact, but the actual tree part is much much smaller.
The trunk portion (pole wrapped in tinsel) is 1 foot 3, the top spindly-solo-tinsel piece is 7, so more than a half foot is a single piece of tinsel. Subtract that and you get a tree thats 3 and half feet high, and it looks it. The circumference at the biggest part is about 2 ft.
I was utterly UNDERwhelmed.
The fullness is about what youd expect, not super lush . . but I didnt see any on that were. Tinsel trees tend to be spindly, at this price point anyway.
Overall, Id recommend trying the 6 over the 5 version, unless you want a table top tree. If I had it to do again, I wouldnt purchase this . . its definitely not worth the money.
Teeny-Tiny, more like a 3.5 tree. Too much money for a whole lotta trunk.
I was really disappointed with my 5 foot tree, mainly the size. Yes, it is TECHNICALLY 5 ft (53) to be exact, but the actual tree part is much much smaller. The trunk portion (pole wrapped in tinsel) is 1 foot 3, the top spindly-solo-tinsel piece is 7, so more than a half foot is a single piece of tinsel. Subtract that and you get a tree thats 3 and half feet high, and it looks it. The circumference at the biggest part is about 2 ft. I was utterly UNDERwhelmed. The fullness is about what youd expect, not super lush . . but I didnt see any on that were. Tinsel trees tend to be spindly, at this price point anyway. Overall, Id recommend trying the 6 over the 5 version, unless you want a table top tree. If I had it to do again, I wouldnt purchase this . . its definitely not worth the money.